Maurizio Castelletti: DG Mobility and Transport, ex-Head of Unit Single European Sky, European Commission

26 January 2019
Maurizio Castelletti spent 15 years guiding the development of European ATM. Source: SJU

Maurizio Castelletti contributed to the launch of the Single European Sky (SES) and authored the legislative process in the early 2000s. He was appointed SES Head of Unit within DG MOVE in 2011, at the start of the implementation phase of the second SES package. He spoke to Jane’s a few weeks before his departure in January 2019, after 15 years guiding development of European air traffic management (ATM), to become head of the Single European Railway Area Unit.

The first SES package was approved by EU member states, stakeholders, and industry in 2004, with high-level objectives of tripling airspace capacity, halving costs, and generating a 10-fold improvement in safety by 2020.

After a slow start, Castelletti said, the launch of the Single European Sky ATM Research Programme (SESAR) in 2007 “brought a paradigm shift”, with a partnership and innovation cycle linked to the SES policy. “This has delivered solutions but has yet to deliver the operational targets of the original concept. We have been accused by the Court of Auditors of being too technology-driven, without solutions that promote implementation or that are interoperable with other systems in the world.”

Castelletti believes these lessons can be learnt. “We can do this by using existing tools, I don’t think we have to ‘reinvent the wheel’. The Single Sky framework is still valid in my view but there needs to be a change in the way in which we implement this: a change in governance, a change in methodology.”

Unresolved problems

One major SES objective – to remove fragmentation – remains unfulfilled. “We still have 28 service providers and the same number of area control centres. National interest still prevails,” he argued.

“I see a compound lack of political will and persistence of monopoly service provision. Fragmentation is not only in service provision but also among airspace users and airports.

Want to read more? For analysis on this article and access to all our insight content, please enquire about our subscription options at

(332 of 1109 words)



    PIS/LFBI AIRFIELD REF PT.: N46 35.15 E000 18.24 ELEVATION : 423' 129m CFR : 5 MAX RWY LENGTH : 7,710' 2,350 m General Information SURFACE : Rwy 03/21, 7,710' 2,350 m, width 148' 45 m, asphalt, PCN 44 F/C/W/T. ADDITIONAL RUNWAYS : Rwy 03R/21L, 2,297' 700 m, width 148' 60 m, grass, Rwy 03L/21R,


    HOR/LPHR AIRFIELD REF PT.: N38 31.19 W028 42.95 ELEVATION : 118' 36m CFR : 6 MAX RWY LENGTH : 5,233' 1,595m General Information SURFACE : Rwy 10/28, 5,233' 1,595 m, width 148' 45 m, asphalt. ADDITIONAL RUNWAYS : None. RUNWAY LIGHTING : Rwy 10: LIRL, REIL, ALSF-2, PAPI.Rwy 28: LIRL, REIL, ALSF-2,

  • PICO

    PIX/LPPI AIRFIELD REF PT.: N38 33.16 W028 26.29 ELEVATION : 109' 33m CFR : 0 MAX RWY LENGTH : 5,725' 1,745m General Information SURFACE : Rwy 09/27 Twy, 5,725' 1,745 m, width 148' 45 m, asphalt, PCN 80 F/B/W/T. ADDITIONAL RUNWAYS : None. RUNWAY LIGHTING : Rwy 09: LIRL, PAPI.Rwy 27: LIRL, ALSF-2,


    SMA/LPAZ AIRFIELD REF PT.: N36 58.28 W025 10.24 ELEVATION : 308' 94m CFR : 7 MAX RWY LENGTH : 10,000' 3,048m General Information SURFACE : Rwy 18/36, 10,000' 3,048 m, width 197' 60 m, concrete. ADDITIONAL RUNWAYS : Rwy 15/33, 6,004' 1,830 m; Rwy 04/22, 4,345' 1,324 m; both asphalt; both closed.